1. Entertainment

Discuss in my forum

'Daybreakers' Movie Review

About.com Rating 4 Star Rating
Be the first to write a review

By , About.com Guide

'Daybreakers' poster.© Lionsgate
In 2003, Australian brothers Michael and Peter Spierig wrote and directed Undead, a zombie movie whose ambition, energy and cinematic flair belied its low budget. The film didn't hit the US until 2005, and while it didn't make a major splash, it impressed enough people at Lionsgate to warrant the greenlighting of the brothers' next pitch with a $40 million dollar budget. Like Undead, Daybreakers exudes ambition and creativity, taking the vampire mythos in a new and unexpected direction: the future.

The Plot

In the year 2019, a strain of vampirism spread from a single bat has infected virtually the entire globe. Vampires make up the majority of the population, but otherwise society appears to run as it had when humans were atop the food chain -- business people go to work, children attend school, police officers maintain order -- except that everything takes place at night. During the day, the world is a ghost town, as the sun-sensitive undead retreat to their shielded homes.

Humans had been given the option of assimilation, but few took the vampires up on their offer. As such, they're now systematically rounded up and harvested for their blood, slowly drained in massive Matrix-like industrial farms until their dry, emaciated husks are chucked into the trash. The Bromley Marks corporation is the primary blood supplier, but it faces a grim future: the supply of human cattle is dwindling, and the clock is ticking on the company's efforts to develop a synthetic blood substitute that can sustain the vampire population's insatiable demand. Complicating matters is the fact that when vampires are starved of blood, they devolve into pointy-eared, winged creatures known as "subsiders" (because they tend to live underground) who have little control over their animalistic impulse to feed.

L-R: Ethan Hawke and Willem Dafoe in 'Daybreakers'.

L-R: Ethan Hawke and Willem Dafoe in 'Daybreakers'.

Photo: Ben Rothstein © Lionsgate
Under the supervision of calculating CEO Charles Bromley (Sam Neill), vampire hematologist Edward (Ethan Hawke; settle down, Twilight fans) has taken the lead on Bromley Marks' efforts to manufacture synthetic blood, but when his human sympathies become known (he drinks only animal blood), he's sought out by a group of human rebels who've made a discovery that could prevent the extinction of the their race. Caught between betraying his own kind and doing what he feels is right, Edward must reconcile his allegiances with the knowledge that both races are on the verge of ruin.

The End Result

The first great horror movie of 2010 just so happens to be the first horror movie of 2010. Daybreakers is a fresh and original take on vampire lore, using its genre trappings to convey an uncommonly conscious, allegorical reflection on society that touches upon class and racial conflict, the ethics of big business, politics, poverty, homelessness and the ravaging of natural resources. Most notable is the parallel between blood and oil, with a blood shortage in the film fueling price hikes, riots and violence -- the sort of chaos that doesn't seem so far-fetched in today's world.

What could've become heavy-handed sermonizing, however, is treated matter-of-factly as a natural product of this alternate reality that is both alien and unmistakably familiar. There's a dry sense of humor to scenes of vampire businessmen lining up for their morning -- er, midnight -- cup of blood-infused coffee, no less hooked than Starbucks customers are today. Daybreakers' approach is more True Blood than Dracula or even 30 Days of Night, with the traditional trappings of vampirism taking a back seat to the overall plot and message. Rarely do the living dead "vamp out" (they leave that to the uncouth subsiders); rather, they mirror us -- our conflicts, our struggles, our failings -- with a clever, satirical slant.

Sam Neill in 'Daybreakers'.

Sam Neill in 'Daybreakers'.

Photo: Ben Rothstein © Lionsgate

Despite the genteel nature of the vampires, there's something intriguingly metaphorical about the Mr. Hyde-like hidden beast lying in wait inside them all. Each is just a few days' fasting away from becoming a subsider. The "haves" can become the "have-nots" in the blink of an eye; they're poised to become irrational, raving monsters and are willing to commit even more monstrous acts to prevent this from happening. This vampire-subsider dichotomy is all part of this fascinating world that the Spierig brothers have created -- one of delicate balances, duplicitous facades and uneasy alliances.

Lest I make it sound like an arthouse pic, though, let me assure you that Daybreakers provides ample action, R-rated dialogue and extravagant violence that coats the screen in blood. Despite its often high-minded message, the film isn't ashamed of its pulpy roots and is more than willing to deliver popcorn thrills with eye-popping visuals. With a budget considerably larger than their previous outing, the Spierigs are able to flex their cinematic muscle, showcasing their flair for not only scares and horror gore, but also for high-octane action. There are actually more car chases and shootouts in Daybreakers than there are the expected scenes of neck chomping and vampire staking.

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.