1. Entertainment

Discuss in my forum

'Coma' Miniseries Review

About.com Rating 2 Star Rating
User Rating 2 Star Rating (1 Review) write a review

By , About.com Guide

'Coma' poster. © A&E
Remakes are a dime a dozen in the 21st century, but made-for-TV remakes of theatrical feature films are less common -- and a miniseries remake of a big-screen movie is downright rare. And so it's with some intrigue that we view A&E's Coma, a retelling of the novel by Robin Cook and based on the 1978 Michael Crichton film starring Michael Douglas and Geneviève Bujold.

The Plot

Susan Wheeler (Lauren Ambrose) is a young medical student and aspiring neurosurgeon who recently transferred from New York to Atlanta. Although her grandfather is a local legend who performed the city's first open-heart surgery, she doesn't want to ride on his laurels and begins working her way up as a trainee at Peach Tree Memorial Hospital. It's not long, though, before the hospital staff notices her for all the wrong reasons.

When an acquaintance of hers undergoes a minor fibroid surgery at the hospital and ends up in a coma, she begins to investigate what seems like a disproportionate number of Peach Tree patients who unnecessarily end up in a vegetative state. The trail of evidence leads her to the Jefferson Institute, a secretive, state-of-the-art facility that houses long-term coma patients. But trying to tie the hospital together with the the institute leads through a minefield of disbelief, hostility, secrets and murder that leaves Susan wondering whom she can trust.

The End Result

Lauren Ambrose in 'Coma'.

Lauren Ambrose in 'Coma'.

© A&E
Given the talent involved in Coma -- from cast members like Geena Davis, Richard Dreyfuss, Ellen Burstyn and James Woods to producers Ridley and Tony Scott and writer John McLaughlin, who co-wrote the award-winning Black Swan -- it's shocking how bland a miniseries this turns out to be. Not only is it lacking in thrills, but it's as emotionally sterile as an operating room.

It's hard to say who's to blame. The cast obviously knows how to act, but their performances consistently come across as either overblown, dull or, in Davis' case, borderline comatose. The script doesn't help matters, removing the original's edge by dulling the sense of paranoia, eliminating the feminist angle, dumbing down the more realistic medical aspects, making the villains seem distractingly inept and sapping all the suspense out of a restructured ending. Because it's a four-hour miniseries, the creators feel like they can toss in extra characters, but it feels like they introduce them all within the first 20 minutes, making for a dizzying opening that feels rushed, minimizing dramatic impact.

Veteran TV director Mikael Salomon, who previously helmed two miniseries remakes -- 2008's The Andromeda Strain and the 2004's Stephen King adaptation Salem's Lot -- displays little of the visual panache he showed cinematographer/director of photography in films like The Abyss, Backdraft and Always. Rather, the whole production feels at best by-the-numbers and at worst like a chintzy movie of the week that blew most of its budget on the cast. What little thrills are generated from the script are negated by some unnecessarily shaky camerawork, abrupt scene transitions and cartoonish villains who all seem to be on the verge of cackling and wringing their hands. I haven't read Robin Cook's novel to know if the characterization of the main goon in the miniseries as a hallucinating murderous psychopath is truer than the original film, but his story takes things on a tangent that seems out of place in the script.

There are some interesting elements to the remake that have become more topical nowadays than back in 1978 -- stem cell research, for instance -- but Coma doesn't really present them in a thought-provoking manner, and it feels at times like the filmmakers wanted to make this remake just because tossing in references to stem cells and cloning just would make it sound hip and edgy. It doesn't, of course, but the cast, despite underperforming, keeps it all watchable. If this were the first few episodes of a TV show, however, it's hard to believe that Coma would do enough to hook viewers for the long haul.

The Skinny

  • Acting: C- (A great ensemble cast consistently underwhelms.)
  • Direction: D+ (Fails to convey drama and suspense while delivering sterile visuals.)
  • Script: D+ (Too many characters, too few thrills, too little real emotion.)
  • Gore/Effects: C (No gore; little need for special effects.)
  • Overall: C- (A rote thriller boasting little beyond a big-name cast.)

Coma is directed by Mikael Salomon and airs on A&E on September 3 and 4, 2012.

Disclosure: The studio provided free access to this movie for review purposes. For more information, please see our Ethics Policy.

User Reviews

 2 out of 5
Why I found the remake of Coma a disappointment., Member SamCarson

When I am going to spend time and on occasion money to view a film, I expect the creators and the cast to do two things. First you must entertain me and therefore hold my attention, and second make me believe you are who you are, and act accordingly. This means if you are playing the part of a college professor I expect you to be able to construct a sentence with both a subject and a verb. If you are in law enforcement you had best not take out you gun in a fast food establishment, and play with it like it was your favorite toy. Unless of course you are trying to prove to me you’re a nut job. The collection of killers in this film were either too crazy or too stupid to have kept a business of harvesting organs and worse, up and running for as long as they did. Considering that it appears that they were able to pull this off for what must have been decades….to quote Paul McCartney, “Maybe I’m Amazed”. If you look at what they had managed to accomplish to date, than it must be a well organized, controlled and contained death corporation, being run by brilliant and cunning individuals. Well…it wasn’t. In the first film I cared about Susan Wheeler living and therefore succeeding. I wanted Mark to believe her so she would be able to bring this nightmare into the light of day. That was all I expected the two of them to do….expose the evil doers and let the law deal with them. In order to do this they had to survive, since no one else seemed to know or care what was going on in the under-belly of the medical profession. If the two of them had been silenced, than business would have continued, and no one would have been the wiser. Doctor Lindquist in the end proved to be the weakest link among the upper echelon, and because of her foolish and irresponsible actions it was she who caused the bloody house of cards to crash and burn. She is the one who put the psycho on the trail of Wheeler, knowing full well he was an unbalanced killer with little grasp on reality. Sending a drug inducted mentally disturbed individual out to do the job that belongs to a highly trained detached assassin, told me that she herself was sitting in a high position that she was not qualified for. And you would like me to swallow that she is a highly trained shrink? I wouldn’t allow her to pet sit. In the original production the only collateral damage was the handy man that was electrocuted in the basement, by one of the scariest none speaking professional killers I have had the horrifying pleasure to watch. Now if you are going to run a global murder business, he is the one to hire. Most likely he had no idea what was transpiring, and as long as the price was right I doubt he cared. That by the way was smart. Having the mental deficient put hidden cameras in Wheeler’s apartment was foolish beyond belief. With as big and wide spread this horror story is, the last thing you want to do is leave a trail of any kind. Cameras can be found, and so they were. Regardless if the law personnel believed Susan or not, once they found the cameras red flags were flying. Then throw into the blood fray the body count discovered in what ever that building was, and I doubt they would have decided to take a donut break. In short, even if Susan and Mark had not survived, it was only a matter of time that the goings on at the Jefferson Institute would have been discovered. Because of Lindquist’s folly, three quarters of the way through, Mark and Susan’s survival became irrelevant to the hoped for outcome. Shut this business down!! I don’t mind a few crazies tossed in for laughs, but they should pop up naturally and not by grand design. Many comments have been made about Ellen Burstyn’s roll being just wonderful….well, no. It might have been the highlight of the production, but in retrospect, that isn’t saying much. If I was sitting at the top of the murderous pyramid, and was interviewing personal for major positions in something so deadly and secretive, five minutes after interviewing her I would not only have trashed her resume, but would have quietly had her committed just to be on the save side. Coma, anyone? Elizabeth Ashley in the roll was perfect. She was cold, she was ice, and considering what she did for a living I would expect nothing more. See Stepford Wives can hold down a job. Having Ellen’s character perform the way she did just added another loose canon to the corporation. I think intelligence was sacrificed in this telling for more… which gave us less. When Bujold realized she was in danger she at least checked into a hotel. The little girl-scout in this one goes back to her apartment even after finding cameras, and thinks she can deal with the monster with what….a cookie? I have seen some stupid uses for cell phones, but this film has at least made the top of the list in something. James Woods character was taken out in broad daylight via a slow moving vehicle and no one noticed this? Really, and what planet was this happening on? You can’t smack your kid in a parking lot these days without the world knowing about it on the 11 pm news. If the first venture of this really wasn’t so great, then the second effort made it brilliant. If you really want to be scare and worry about checking in for minor surgery. See the original.

Write a review

0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No

©2013 About.com. All rights reserved.